Home  ›  Donald J Trump Is Beating Me Again q i Get the Listing if It Happens Today

Donald J Trump Is Beating Me Again q i Get the Listing if It Happens Today

Written By Monday, May 16, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Donald Trump has displayed a troub­ling pattern of assault­ing judges and the courts for rulings he disagrees with — a pattern that began during his pres­id­en­tial campaign (and even before), and has contin­ued into his pres­id­ency.

This threatens our entire system of govern­ment. The courts are bulwarks of our Consti­tu­tion and laws, and they depend on the public to respect their judg­ments and on offi­cials to obey and enforce their decisions. Fright of personal attacks, public back­lash, or enforce­ment neglect­ures should not color judi­cial decision-making, and public offi­cials take a respons­ib­il­ity to respect courts and judi­cial decisions. Separ­a­tion of powers is not a threat to demo­cracy; it is the essence of demo­cracy.

Collec­ted beneath are examples of Trump's public state­ments assail­ing indi­vidual judges and ques­tion­ing the consti­tu­tional author­ity of the judi­ciary, includ­ing his state­ments on Twit­ter. It volition be updated with new state­ments.

Assault on Justices Sonia Soto­mayor and Ruth Bader Gins­burg

On Febru­ary 24, Trump targeted U.S. Supreme Court Justices Sonia Soto­mayor and Ruth Bader Gins­burg, demand­ing that the ii justices should recuse them­selves from any cases that he is involved in.

The attacks came after Justice Soto­mayor authored a dissent criti­ciz­ing the Supreme Court'south decision to tempor­ar­ily block a lower court ruling prevent­ing the Trump Admin­is­tra­tion from deny­ing green cards to immig­rants based on their use of public bene­fits like Medi­caid, SNAP, and hous­ing assist­ance. In herdissent inWolf v. Melt County, Justice Soto­mayor wrote that putting a lower courtroom's decision on hold while the govern­ment appeals that decision is an "extraordin­ary" act, appro­pri­ate only when the govern­ment can show urgent and irre­par­able impairment if their request is not gran­ted. Soto­mayor said that, "Claim­ing 1 emer­gency later some other, the govern­ment has recently sought stays in an unpre­ced­en­ted number of case­s…And with each success­ive applic­a­tion…its cries of urgency ring increas­ingly hollow." "Information technology is hard to say what is more troub­ling: that the Govern­ment seek this extraordin­ary relief seem­ingly as a matter of grade, or that the Courtroom would grant it," Soto­mayor wrote.

Trump besidestargeted Justice Gins­burg in this attack over comments she made during his 2016 entrada, in which shesaid, " I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the coun­try would be — with Donald Trump as our pres­id­ent."

Attack on Judge Amy Berman Jack­son Follow­ing the Roger Rock Case

In Febru­ary 2020, Trump attacked Judge Amy Berman Jack­son, the judge who is presid­ing over his onetime adviser Roger Stone's pending crim­inal case in the U.S. District Courtroom for the District of Columbia. Terminal Novem­ber, Stone was bedevilled of lying to congress, witness tamper­ing, and obstruct­ing an invest­ig­a­tion past the U.S. House of Repres­ent­at­ives. The attacks came afterward the Depart­ment of Justice recom­men­ded a sentence of 7–9 years for Stone. In a series of tweets published in Febru­ary, Trump criti­cized this recom­mend­a­tion, and every bit a result, the Depart­ment of Justice indic­ated it would seek a shorter sentence for Stone, prompt­ing four career prosec­utors to with­draw from the case. Estimate Jack­son Berman is sched­uled to make a concluding ruling in Stone'due south case on Febru­ary 20.

Attacks on the Judi­ciary Follow­ing Aviary Ruling

In Novem­ber 2018, Trump announced new rules that would bar anyone cross­ing the U.Southward.-United mexican states border non through an offi­cial port of entry from receiv­ing asylum. On Novem­ber 20, Judge Jon Tigar of the U.Southward. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered the admin­is­tra­tion to take asylum claims regard­less of where migrants entered the coun­attempt. Trump chosen the determination "a disgrace," attacked Tigar equally "an Obama judge," and critiqued the Ninth Excursion as "really some­thing we take to take a look at because it's not fair," calculation, "That's not police force. Every instance that gets filed in the Ninth Circuit we go beaten."

In a rare response, Chief Justice John Roberts told the AP that the U.S. does­n't have "Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clin­ton judges. What we have is an extraordin­ary group of dedic­ated judges doing their level all-time to practise equal correct to those appear­ing earlier them." Roberts added that "The inde­pend­ent judi­ciary is some­matter we should all be give thanks­ful for."

Trump respon­ded on Twit­ter, defend­ing his claim and once more ques­tion­ing the impar­ti­al­ity of the Ninth Circuit:


Trump then sugges­ted break­ing upwards the Ninth Circuit, a motility that a Rep. Darrell Issa [R-CA] proposed in Septem­ber 2018.


The 24-hour interval after Roberts' response, Trump contin­ued to refute the Main Justice and decried "Judi­cial Activ­ism":

Carter Page FISA Applic­a­tion

On July 22, 2018, the Trump Admin­is­tra­tion released a previ­ously clas­si­fied Foreign Intel­li­gence Surveil­lance Human activity (FISA) warrant applic­a­tion regard­ing Trump'due south former strange policy campaign adviser, Carter Page. Organ­iz­a­tions similar Judi­cial Sentinel had sued for its disclos­ure. Trump took the release equally an oppor­tun­ity to falsely claim the Page surveil­lance precip­it­ated special coun­sel Robert Mueller's invest­ig­a­tion, to argue that the wiretap applic­a­tion relied too heav­ily on the unveri­fied Steele dossier, and to argue that Mueller's invest­ig­a­tion must end. In a series of tweets, Trump get-go claimed that the Depart­ment of Justice and FBI "misled the courts":

So Trump used the words of conser­vat­ive writer Andrew McCarthy to directly attack the judges who author­ized the FISA applic­a­tion:

Attacks on the Judi­ciary Follow­ing DACA Ruling

On Tues­day, Janu­ary 9th, 2018, District Court Guess William Alsup tempor­ar­ily blocked the Trump admin­is­tra­tion from catastrophe the Deferred Activeness for Child­hood Arrivals (DACA) program, principal­tain­ing protec­tions for 'Dream­ers.' The Trump admin­is­tra­tion appealed Alsup's determination. Follow­ing Alsup'due south ruling, Trump tweeted:

Critique of the Berg­dahl Ruling

Bowe Berg­dahl, a former U.S. Ground forces soldier, walked away from his unit and was captured by the Taliban in 2009. From 2009 to 2014, he was held captive by the Taliban. In 2014, the Obama admin­is­tra­tion brokered a pris­oner exchange, and ulti­mately, the Taliban released Berg­dahl in exchange for 5 Guantanamo Bay detain­ees.

Trump, while on the campaign trail, repeatedly critiqued the exchange.

In one speech, Trump argued,

"So we get a traitor named Berg­dahl—a dirty rotten trait­or—who, by the way, when he deser­ted, 6 young, boyfriend­ti­ful people were killed trying to notice him, and you don't even hear about them anymore. Someone said the other day, well, he has some psycho­lo­gical prob­lems – well, you know, in the old days, bing, bong—when we were potent, when we were strong. So we get Berg­dahl, a traitor, and they get 5 of the people that they most wanted anywhere in the globe, 5 killers that are right now back on the boxing­field, doing a task. That'southward the kind of deals nosotros brand."

Follow­ing these comments, Berg­dahl's lawyers filed a movement in 2016 to dismiss the charges pending against him, arguing that Trump's comments precluded Berg­dahl from receiv­ing a off-white trial. This move was rejec­ted. Ulti­mately, Berg­dahl pleaded guilty to charges of deser­tion and misbe­ha­vior in Octo­ber of 2017; on Novem­ber three, 2017, Berg­dahl was sentenced to a dishon­or­able discharge, a reduced rank, and a monthly fine, only did not receive a prison sentence. In response, Trump tweeted,

Attacks on the Judi­cial System in Response to Terror­ist Attacks

On Tues­day, Octo­ber 31st, 2017, a terror­ist assault in Manhat­tan led to 8 deaths and several seri­ous injur­ies. The doubtable saidhe drew inspir­a­tion from ISIS. On Novem­ber 1st, 2017, Donald Trump fabricated the follow­ing state­ment in response, call­ing the courts a "joke" and a "laugh­ing­stock." Trump also said he would "certainly consider" transport­ing the suspect to the U.Due south. milit­ary prison house in Guantá­namo Bay. Trump stated:

"That was a horrible outcome, and we have to cease it, and we have to terminate information technology cold. We too accept to come upwards with punish­ment that's far quicker and far greater than the punish­ment these anim­als are getting right now. They'll go through court for years. And at the cease, they'll be — who knows what happens.

We demand quick justice and nosotros need stiff justice — much quicker and much stronger than we have right now. Considering what we take right now is a joke and it'due south a laugh­ing­stock. And no wonder so much of this stuff takes place. And I call up I can speak for plenty of other coun­tries, too, that are in the same situ­ation."

Trump followed this land­ment with a Tweet:

Trump then switched from advoc­at­ing the doubtable be sent to Guantá­namo Bay, to advoc­at­ing he receive the death penalisation.

Attacks on Courts, and Judges Person­ally, for Stay­ing Immig­ra­tion Exec­ut­ive Orders

On Fri, Febru­ary three, 2017, Wash­ing­ton U.S. District Court Judge James Robart issued a decision tempor­ar­ily stay­ing enforce­ment of Donald Trump's Janu­ary 27 exec­ut­ive guild limit­ing immig­ra­tion from seven predom­in­antly Muslim coun­tries and halt­ing the admis­sion of refugees from anywhere. On Febru­ary 9, the Ninth Circuit denied the govern­ment's asking for a stay of the commune court'south order. Trump issued a revised version of the immig­ra­tion exec­ut­ive order on March 6, 2017, which narrowed the telescopic to six coun­tries and exemp­ted green menu and visa hold­ers, among other changes. On March xv, 2017, a federal judge in Hawaii tempor­ar­ily blocked enforce­ment of the order nation­broad, followed past a March 16 order by a federal judge in Mary­land. On May 26, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, upheld the stay of the travel ban.

Trump has made a series of tweets and public state­ments attack­ing the decid­ing judges person­ally, ques­tion­ing the writer­ity of federal courts to review his orders, suggest­ing the court is biased, and propose­ing that the judges and court arrangement would be to arraign for future terror­ist attacks.

Comments Concern­ing March 6 Exec­ut­ive Gild

On June 3, 2017 and again on June 5, 2017, follow­ing a terror­ist assault in London over the week­stop, the Pres­id­ent tweeted the follow­ing country­ments:

He has too said the follow­ing state­ments over the class of the last few months at public events, speeches, and tele­6­sion inter­views:

"We're as well taking decis­ive action to improve our vetting proced­ures. The courts are not help­ing us I take to be honest. Information technology's ridicu­lous. Some­torso said I should not criti­cize judges, Okay, I'll criti­cize judges. To keep crim­in­als and terror­ists the hell out of our coun­try, we are keep­ing these prom­ises and many, many more."

"Moments ago I learned that a commune court in Hawaii, part of the much over­turned Ninth Circuit Court. And I have to be nice, other­wise I'll exist criti­cized for speak­ing poorly about our courts. I'll be criti­cized past these people, amidst the almost dishon­est people in the earth,…for speak­ing harshly about our courts. I could never desire to do that."

"This is an unpre­ced­en­ted judi­cial over­reach. The law and consti­tu­tion allows the pres­id­ent to suspend immig­ra­tion when he or she…­for­tu­nately it won't be Hillary she, when he or she deems it to be in the national interest of our coun­try."

"I know you aren't skep­tical people. You don't think this was washed by a judge for polit­ical reas­ons do you? This ruling makes us look weak, which nosotros no longer are, believe me."

"Nosotros are going to fight this terrible ruling…we're going to win…nosotros're going to keep our citizens prophylactic."

"People are scream­ing break-up the Ninth Excursion…that Ninth Circuit, y'all have to see, accept a look at how many times they have been over­turned with their terrible decisions. Take a look. And this is what we have to live with."

Comments Business concern­ing Janu­ary 27 Exec­ut­ive Order

"I don't always desire to telephone call a court biased, so I won't telephone call it biased…But courts seem to exist so polit­ical."

Comments Follow­ing Barcelona Terror­ist Attack

Follow­ing a terror­ist attack in Spain, Trump made the follow­ing tweets on August 18. Trump argued his travel ban would forbid terror­ist attacks, but for Demo­crats "united states of america[ing] the courts" to forestall his agenda.

Attacks on Courts for Block­ing Sanc­tu­ary City Exec­ut­ive Social club

On Tues­mean solar day, April 25, Cali­for­nia U.South. Commune Judge William Orrick 3 gran­ted a prelim­in­ary injunc­tion, block­ing the imple­ment­a­tion of Donald Trump'due south exec­ut­ive order with­hold­ing federal funds from "sanc­tu­ary cities"—those that limit how they cooper­ate with the federal govern­ment to comport immig­rants lack­ing legal condition.

Follow­ing the ruling, Trump made a series of tweets criti­ciz­ing the courts and Approximate Orrick. Although Trump's comments refer­enced the Ninth Circuit, it was the U.S. District Court, which sits within the 9th Excursion, that issued the relev­ant club.

The White House too issued a state­ment, saying "the rule of constabulary suffered another blow, as an unelec­ted judge unilat­er­ally rewrote immig­ra­tion policy for our Nation." It contin­ued: "This San Fran­cisco gauge's erro­neous ruling is a gift to the crim­inal gang and cartel element in our coun­effort, empower­ing the worst kind of human traf­fick­ing and sex traf­fick­ing, and putting g­sands of inno­cent lives at run a risk." Finally, information technology closed by call­ing the decision "notwithstanding one more case of egre­gious over­attain past a single, unelec­ted district judge."

On April 26, Trump gave an inter­view in which he said he has "abso­lutely" thought about break­ing up the Ninth Circuit. He contin­ued: "Every­torso imme­di­ately runs to the 9th Excursion. And nosotros have a large coun­try. We take lots of other loca­tions. Merely they imme­di­ately run to the ninth Circuit. Because they know that'south like, semi-machine­matic." He also said: "You see judge shop­ping, or what's gone on with these people, they imme­di­ately run to the 9th Circuit," and that "what'south going on in the 9th Circuit is a shame."

Calls for U.South. Supreme Court Justice Gins­bur­one thousand's Resig­na­tion

During the 2016 pres­id­en­tial campaign, U.Southward. Supreme Courtroom Justice Ruth Bader Gins­burg made comments telephone call­ing Donald Trump, then the presumptive Repub­lican pres­id­en­tial nominee, "a faker" and stat­ing "I can't imagine what the coun­try would exist – with Donald Trump as our pres­id­ent." Donald Trump respon­ded in a series of tweets describ­ing Justice Gins­burg as an "incom­pet­ent judge" and call­ing for her resig­na­tion.

Accus­a­tions that U.Southward. Commune Courtroom Approximate Curiel Is Biased

In response to U.South. District Court Judge Gonzalo O. Curi­el's orders in a class activeness lawsuit against Trump Univer­sity, and so-pres­id­en­tial candid­ate Trump fabricated a number of state­ments set on­ing Approximate Curiel as biased because of his "Mexican herit­age" and appoint­ment by a Demo­cratic pres­id­ent.

Donald Trump said on CNN: "I've been treated very unfairly by this judge. Now, this judge is of Mexican herit­age, I'm build­ing a wall!" Trump contin­ued: "He's a fellow member of a soci­ety where – y'all know – very pro-Mexico and that's fine, it'due south all fine, but I think – I call back – he should recuse himself."

Trump's Rhet­oric About Courts Prior to Running for Pres­id­ent

Donald Trump's tweets prior to announ­cing his pres­id­en­tial candid­acy display similar rhet­oric target­ing indi­vidual judges and the judi­ciary. Select examples are provided below.


johnsonexal1991.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/his-own-words-presidents-attacks-courts

0 Response to "Donald J Trump Is Beating Me Again q i Get the Listing if It Happens Today"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel